IoT vs. IoMT: What Sets Them Apart in Healthcare?

Posted in IOMT

Billions of devices come online each year, growing the vast Internet of Things (IoT) that powers smart homes, cities, and industries. But once this connectivity enters healthcare, it becomes far more specialized and intelligence-driven, forming the Internet of Medical Things (IoMT). With the IoMT market expected to exceed $500 billion by 2030, understanding IoT vs. IoMT is critical. While IoT uses data to optimize convenience and efficiency in general, IoMT pairs connected medical devices with AI to support diagnosis, real-time patient monitoring, and clinical decision-making. To understand why these differences matter, let’s break down how IoT and IoMT.

What is the Internet of Things (IoT)?

The Internet of Things, or IoT, is a broad term describing a network of physical objects embedded with sensors and software that allow them to connect and exchange data with other systems and devices over the internet.

In IoT, the “things” can be anything from common household items like thermostats, ovens, and washing machines to more specialized equipment like assembly line robotics, agricultural monitors, or city traffic sensors. These devices function as data collectors, capturing real-world information (temperature, location, status, vibration, etc.) and feeding it back to a central platform for processing and analysis.

The main purpose behind general IoT is convenience, efficiency, and automation. By providing real-time data on asset performance or environmental conditions, IoT allows businesses to cut costs, predict maintenance needs, and offer consumers more streamlined experiences. 

What is the Internet of Medical Things (IoMT)?

The Internet of Medical Things, or IoMT, is a highly specific, regulated subset of IoT framework that is dedicated exclusively to the healthcare sector. IoMT connects: 

• Medical devices
• Patient monitoring systems
• Software applications
• Other healthcare infrastructure

The goal is to improve patient care, diagnostics, and clinical efficiency.

IoMT devices collect Protected Health Information (PHI) and clinical data, which is then transmitted securely to healthcare providers via EHRs and analytical platforms. The “things” in IoMT are critical tools like continuous glucose monitors (CGMs), connected heart monitors, smart infusion pumps, hospital bed sensors, and wearable diagnostic patches.

IoT vs IoMT: The core purpose of IoMT is patient safety and well-being. The functionality and reliability of an IoMT device directly impact human health and life. This higher purpose dictates a much stricter and more demanding environment for everything from hardware design and data transmission to software updates and regulatory compliance.

IoT vs IoMT: Main Differences

While both IoT and IoMT rely on the same fundamental technologies (sensors, connectivity, cloud), their application creates a critical divergence in every other domain, as summarized below:

Feature	Internet of Things (IoT)	Internet of Medical Things (IoMT)
Primary Goal	Efficiency, convenience, automation, and cost reduction.	Patient safety, clinical outcomes, diagnosis, and life support.
Risk of Failure	Financial loss, inconvenience, property damage.	Severe patient harm, injury, or death.
Data Type	General consumer data, operational data (low-stakes).	Protected Health Information (PHI), clinical data (high-stakes).
Regulation	Minimal (FCC/CE, general safety standards).	Extensive and mandated (FDA, HIPAA, GDPR).
Product Lifespan	Can be short (1-3 years) or long (5-10 years), with inconsistent updates.	Must be long-term, with guaranteed support and immediate security patching for the lifetime of the device.
Data Availability	High tolerance for latency and downtime.	Near-zero tolerance; real-time performance and high availability are mandatory.

5 Differences Explained in Detail

1. Purpose and Risk Profile

IoT Risk: In the general IoT space, risk is primarily assessed in terms of asset damage or financial loss. If an industrial sensor fails, a company might lose production time or need to replace a piece of equipment. If a smart lock is compromised, a homeowner might face a security breach and property theft. While serious, these risks are almost always quantifiable in dollars and cents. The technology is often deployed to mitigate financial risk or increase comfort.

IoMT Risk: IoMT operates under the highest possible risk profile, patient safety. The failure of a connected device is a clinical catastrophe.

• Mission-Critical Devices: A networked infusion pump delivering chemotherapy must never malfunction or be remotely commandeered.
• Real-time Monitoring: Wearable monitors used for remote chronic disease management must provide accurate, real-time data. A delay or error in data transmission could lead a physician to miss a crucial warning sign, resulting in permanent injury or death. 

This life-critical nature forces IoMT developers to prioritize safety and redundancy above all else, often making development more expensive and complex than any general IoT solution.

2. Regulatory and Compliance Burden

The laws governing patient health information are non-negotiable, creating the single largest barrier to entry for IoMT innovators.

IoT Regulation: Regulation is minimal. Devices must adhere to standard wireless communications rules (like those set by the FCC or CE) and general consumer product safety standards. There is no central, mandatory body dictating the device’s software design, longevity, or data handling unless it is related to a specific industry (like automotive or aviation).

IoMT Regulation: The IoMT space is heavily regulated, classifying connected health devices as medical devices.

• FDA Oversight (US): Devices often require rigorous pre-market clearance (e.g., 510(k)) from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. This process demands extensive documentation proving the device’s safety, effectiveness, and the security of its software throughout its entire lifecycle.
• International Standards: Similar stringent requirements are imposed by organizations like the European Medicines Agency (EMA) and must comply with international standards like ISO 13485 (for quality management systems). This compliance adds years and millions of dollars to the development cycle of a medical device compared to a consumer gadget.

3. Data Sensitivity and Privacy Standards

All data has value, but PHI has a uniquely high level of protection and risk.

IoT Data: General IoT data is often related to consumer behavior, location, energy usage, or basic diagnostics. If breached, the consequences usually involve identity theft or privacy violations, governed by general consumer protection laws (like GDPR for European citizens).

IoMT Data: The data collected, heart rhythms, blood glucose levels, medication dosages, and diagnostic images, is classified as Protected Health Information (PHI). This is enforced by laws like:

• HIPAA (U.S.): Mandates strict rules for the storage, transmission, and access of PHI. Any organization handling this data must implement specific technical, physical, and administrative safeguards. Breaches can result in catastrophic fines and criminal liability.
• Encryption and Anonymization: IoMT systems must use robust, end-to-end encryption for data both in transit and at rest. Furthermore, great care must be taken when analyzing data to ensure that any de-identification or anonymization processes cannot be reversed to trace the information back to an individual patient.

4. Security and Patch Management Strategy

While both sectors worry about security, IoMT defines security as a core function of patient safety.

IoT Security: Security is often a secondary concern, especially for low-cost devices, leading to well-documented problems: devices shipped with default or hardcoded credentials, poor encryption, and a general lack of ongoing software updates. When a vulnerability is found, patching is often slow or ignored entirely by manufacturers who have already moved on to the next product generation.

IoMT Security: Security must be “baked in” from the very first line of code and throughout the entire supply chain.

• System Integrity: IoMT focuses on Availability, Integrity, and Confidentiality (AIC), with Availability and Integrity often prioritized over Confidentiality in crisis scenarios (e.g., a doctor must be able to see a patient’s vital signs even if the EHR is under a DDoS attack).
• Immediate Patching: Because a vulnerability could allow an attacker to cause physical harm (e.g., changing a medication dose), patching for IoMT devices must be near-instantaneous and deployed seamlessly without disrupting the device’s life-critical function.
• Segmentation: IoMT devices and networks within a hospital must be strictly segmented from general IT networks to prevent lateral movement of malware if the main network is compromised.

5. Infrastructure and Operational Requirements

The environment in which the “things” operate defines the reliability needs.

IoT Infrastructure: General IoT networks can tolerate periodic downtime and high latency. For example, if a weather station sensor uploads data every five minutes, a 30-second delay is irrelevant. The focus is on low-power, long-range communication to keep devices running for years on a single battery (e.g., LoRaWAN).

IoMT Infrastructure: Infrastructure requirements are extreme:

• High Availability and Redundancy: IoMT devices in a clinical setting demand 99.999% uptime. Hospitals often employ redundant power, network, and data storage systems to ensure continuity of care even during system failures.
• Latency: For remote surgical robots or real-time diagnostic systems, latency must be minimized to near-zero. This drives the use of high-speed 5G or local edge computing solutions to process data instantaneously.
• Interoperability in Chaos: IoMT devices must also function in the chaotic, high-density environment of a hospital, navigating potential signal interference from hundreds of other wireless devices while maintaining connection to a complex, proprietary EHR system.

IoT and IoMT: Similarities

Despite the critical differences, IoT and IoMT are fundamentally built upon the same core technological principles and face shared, high-level challenges.

1. Technology Stack

Both fields rely on the same foundational components:

• Sensors: Both use various sensors to convert physical phenomena into digital data (e.g., accelerometers, temperature probes).
• Connectivity: Both leverage standard communication protocols like Wi-Fi, Bluetooth Low Energy (BLE), and cellular networks (4G/5G) to transport data.
• Cloud/Edge Processing: Both require scalable cloud infrastructure (AWS, Azure, GCP) or localized edge computing power to store, analyze, and manage the massive flow of data.

2. Data-Driven Insights

The primary value of both ecosystems is the shift from retrospective analysis to proactive, predictive action.

• IoT: Predicts when a machine will fail so maintenance can be scheduled before a breakdown occurs.
• IoMT: Predicts when a patient’s condition is about to deteriorate, allowing for intervention before a medical crisis occurs. In both cases, the value is derived from the power of data analytics to forecast future events.

3. Supply Chain Vulnerability

Both IoT and IoMT are susceptible to supply chain attacks. When a component (like a chip or a software library) manufactured by a third party contains a flaw or a backdoor, it affects thousands of end products. The complexity and global nature of hardware manufacturing mean that both general-purpose IoT gadgets and highly sensitive medical devices share a vulnerability to the same types of upstream compromise.

Common Examples and Use Cases

To further clarify the distinction, examining specific examples is helpful.

General IoT Examples

Use Case	Description	Benefit
Smart Thermostats	Learns household patterns to automatically adjust temperatures, connecting to the home Wi-Fi.	Energy efficiency, cost savings, convenience.
Asset Tracking	GPS trackers and sensors monitor the location and condition of shipping containers, vehicles, or high-value equipment.	Supply chain optimization, theft prevention.
Predictive Maintenance (IIoT)	Sensors attached to factory motors or turbines monitor vibration and heat to predict mechanical failure.	Reduction of costly, unplanned downtime.
Smart Retail	RFID tags and shelf sensors track inventory levels and customer movement patterns in a store.	Inventory management, marketing optimization.

Internet of Medical Things (IoMT) Examples

Use Case	Description	Benefit
Continuous Glucose Monitors (CGMs)	Wearable sensors that measure blood sugar every few minutes, sending data to a smartphone app and the patient’s doctor.	Enhanced diabetes management, reduced risk of life-threatening events.
Remote Patient Monitoring (RPM)	Connected blood pressure cuffs, scales, and pulse oximeters used by patients at home to transmit vital signs directly to a clinician dashboard.	Reduction of hospital readmissions, proactive care for chronic diseases.
Connected Infusion Pumps	Clinical devices that deliver fluids or medication intravenously, which can be remotely monitored and managed by the hospital network.	Increased dosage accuracy, reduction of medication errors, hospital efficiency.
Fall Detection Wearables	Devices worn by the elderly that use accelerometers and AI to detect falls and automatically contact emergency services.	Rapid emergency response, reduced injury severity.

IoMT Software Solutions with Folio3 Digital Health 

At Folio3 Digital Health, we develop HIPAA-compliant software solutions that support the growing foundation of the Internet of Medical Things (IoMT) by enabling secure data exchange, device connectivity, and AI-driven insights across healthcare workflows. Our engineering teams build IoMT-ready applications with rigorous privacy controls, encrypted data handling, and robust governance frameworks that align with global healthcare standards. 

These solutions are designed with interoperability in mind and can be integrated with major EHR systems, including platforms such as Epic, through approved APIs, HL7/FHIR integration, and customer-authorized workflows. This approach ensures that connected medical devices, clinical applications, and enterprise health systems work together seamlessly while maintaining compliance and protecting patient information.

Closing Note 

The transformation from general IoT to the specialized domain of IoMT is a defining moment. While the main structure or foundation of connectivity remains the same, hardware and network protocols may be similar, the regulatory, ethical, and safety stakes of IoMT create a digital divide that must be respected. The risks associated with general IoT involve inconvenience and commerce; the risks associated with IoMT involve patient life and highly sensitive personal data.

Frequently Asked Questions 

What is the standard communication protocol for IoMT devices?

While general IoT often uses low-power solutions like LoRaWAN or Zigbee, IoMT commonly relies on Bluetooth Low Energy (BLE) for short-range transmission (e.g., from a wearable to a patient’s phone/gateway) and cellular (4G/5G) or secure Wi-Fi (WPA3-Enterprise) for data transport to the cloud. Protocols like MQTT are frequently used for lightweight, reliable messaging.

How does the concept of “Availability” differ in IoMT vs. IoT?

IoT availability refers to the system being functional. In IoMT, availability is a function of patient safety. For critical devices, it means the device must maintain operation even if its connection to the central network is lost (e.g., having a backup power supply or local data storage) to avoid immediate patient harm.

What is the role of the FHIR standard in IoMT?

FHIR integration is a mandatory standard in IoMT. It defines how healthcare data (like test results, medication lists, and vital signs) should be structured and exchanged. Unlike general IoT data, which can be in any proprietary format, IoMT devices must often map their output to FHIR to ensure seamless, standardized integration with Electronic Health Record (EHR) systems.

Why is battery life more complex for IoMT vs IoT devices?

In general IoT, long battery life (3-5 years) is a cost and convenience factor. In IoMT, it is a safety factor. A device like a long-term implantable monitor must have proven battery integrity and often requires a robust system to warn both the patient and clinician well in advance of battery depletion to schedule replacement safely.

Do IoMT devices use edge computing?

Yes. Edge computing is critical in IoMT to reduce latency for life-critical decisions. Instead of sending all data to the cloud for processing, basic AI or anomaly detection algorithms run directly on the device. This allows the device to trigger an immediate alarm (e.g., detecting a seizure or a heart arrhythmia) without waiting for cloud round-trip time.

What specific data encryption standards must IoMT adhere to?

IoMT must adhere to cryptographic standards that comply with HIPAA and GDPR. This typically means mandatory use of AES-256 encryption for data at rest and TLS/SSL (Transport Layer Security) for data in transit. Furthermore, secure boot mechanisms are often required to ensure that the device’s firmware has not been tampered with before execution.

How are IoMT devices authenticated on a hospital network?

IoMT devices cannot typically use simple passwords due to clinical constraints. They often use certificate-based authentication (e.g., 802.1X EAP-TLS) where a unique digital certificate is provisioned onto the device. This provides a robust, non-guessable, and easily revocable identity for the device on the network.

What is the challenge of “Legacy IoMT” devices?

Unlike general IoT devices, which are quickly replaced, medical devices often have extremely long lifecycles (10-20 years or more) due to cost and regulatory approval. The challenge is that these legacy IoMT devices often run outdated operating systems (like older versions of Windows or Linux) that cannot be easily updated, creating significant, persistent cybersecurity vulnerabilities within hospital networks.

What is a “Software Bill of Materials” (SBOM) and why is it mandatory for IoMT?

An SBOM is a formal, machine-readable list of all software components, libraries, and open-source packages used in a device’s software. It is becoming mandatory for IoMT (often required by the FDA) so that healthcare providers and security teams can immediately identify if a newly discovered vulnerability in a common library (e.g., Log4j) affects any of the active medical devices in their network.

Does IoMT use blockchain technology?

Blockchain is being explored in IoMT to address data integrity and access control. Blockchain’s distributed, immutable ledger could be used to create an unchangeable record of who accessed or modified patient data, enhancing audit trails and reinforcing the security requirements mandated by HIPAA.

About the Author